Serum miR-126 level combined with multi- detector computed tomography in the preoperative prediction of lymph node metastasis of gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Predicting lymph node metastasis (LNM) accurately is vital to design optimal treatment strategies preoperatively for gastric cancer (GC) patients. However, conventional tumor biomarkers and imaging techniques are not sufficient to predict LNM before surgery. miR-126 has been reported to play important roles in tumor metastasis which may represent a novel tumor biomarker. OBJECTIVE: To assess the utility of the combination of serum miR-126 and multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) in predicting LNM preoperatively in GC. METHODS: Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction was performed to examine the serum miR-126 expression levels in 338 GC patients. MDCT was also performed. The cut-off value of preoperative serum miR-126 level for LNM was determined by receiver characteristic curve (ROC) analysis. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine independent predictors for LNM. RESULTS: The serum miR-126 levels of GC patients with LNM were significantly lower compared with those without LNM (p< 0.05). In addition, the later the N stage was, the lower the serum miR-126 level was in GC patients (p< 0.05). With a cut-off value of 63.4, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of serum miR-126 for predicating LNM were 83.2%, 79.0%, 81.9%, 90.4% and 66.4%, respectively. The combination of serum miR-126 level and MDCT increased the accuracy of MDCT prediction for LNM from 69.2% to 86.7%. Serum miR-126 was an independent predictor for LNM. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate for the first time that the combination of serum miR-126 and MDCT is useful for the prediction of LNM in GC.

Down-regulated serum miR-126 is associated with aggressive progression and poor prognosis of gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: miR-126 functions as a tumor suppressor in gastric cancer (GC), however, the clinical significance of serum miR-126 in GC remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the associations of serum miR-126 level with the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of GC patients. METHODS: Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction was performed to examine the expression levels of miR-126 in 338 GC patients' tissues and sera, and 50 healthy controls' sera. The associations of serum miR-126 with clinicopathological characteristics and clinical outcome were evaluated. RESULTS: Compared with the matched adjacent non-tumor tissues and normal sera, miR-126 expression was significantly down-regulated in both tumor tissues and sera of GC patients. Importantly, there was a positive correlation between tissue and serum levels of miR-126 in GC patients. A reduced serum miR-126 level statistically correlated with aggressive clinicopathological characteristics, such as larger tumor size, deeper local invasion, more lymph node metastasis, advanced TNM stage, and poorer prognosis. Notably, multivariate analysis identified reduced serum miR-126 level as an independent predictor for the unfavorable prognosis of GC. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate for the first time that serum miR-126 may serve as a novel prognostic biomarker in GC.

Dysregulation of miR-126/Crk protein axis predicts poor prognosis in gastric cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: miR-126 functions as a tumor suppressor in gastric cancer (GC) by negatively regulating Crk protein expression post-transcriptionally. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the associations of miR-126 and Crk protein expression levels, alone or in combination, with the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of GC patients. METHODS: The expression levels of miR-126 and Crk protein in 338 GC patients were analyzed by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemistry, respectively. The relationship of miR-126 and Crk protein expression with clinicopathologic characteristics and clinical outcome was evaluated. RESULTS: Compared with matched adjacent non-tumor tissues, miR-126 was significantly down-regulated while Crk protein was significantly up-regulated in tumor tissues. A reduced miR-126 expression and an elevated Crk protein expression, alone or in combination, statistically correlated with aggressive clinicopathological characteristics, such as larger tumor size, deeper local invasion, more lymph node metastasis, advanced TNM stage, and poorer prognosis. Multivariate analysis showed that combined miR-126-low/Crk protein-high expression was an independent unfavorable prognostic factor of GC. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate for the first time that miR-126 down-regulation and Crk protein up-regulation may be synergistically associated with tumor progression in GC and may predict unfavorable prognosis of GC.

New blood markers detection technology: A leap in the diagnosis of gastric cancer.

Gastric cancer (GC) is still one of the malignant tumors with high morbidity and mortality in the world, with a 5-year survival rate of less than 30%. GC is often either asymptomatic or causes only nonspecific symptoms in its early stages, whereas when the symptoms manifest, the cancer has usually reached an advanced stage, which is one of the main causes of its relatively poor prognosis. Hence, the main focus of GC research has been on discovering new tools and technology to predict, screen and diagnose GC at an early stage which would prompt early treatment. With the tremendous advances in the OMICS technology, serum proteomics has been in the limelight of cancer research over the last few decades and has steered the development of several methods helping to understand the mechanisms underlying gastric carcinogenesis, resulting in the identification of a large number of molecular targets such as circulating tumor cells (CTCs), cell free DNA (cfDNA) and cell tumor DNA (ctDNA) and their sub-molecular components such as miRNA, that show great promise as GC biomarkers. In this review, we are underlying the recent breakthroughs about new blood markers technology for GC while scrutinizing the potential clinical use of CTCs, cfDNA, ctDNA and the role of the methylation of their sub-molecular components in the pathogenesis, diagnosis and management of GC.

A critical analysis of the cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy combo in the clinical management of advanced gastric cancer: an effective multimodality approach with scope for improvement.

Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is manifested in up to 40% of gastric cancer (GC) patients, after which their 5-year survival drops to less than 5%. The currently most acceptable treatment option for advanced GC (AGC) is systemic chemo and radio therapies with however generally very unsatisfying results and this led to a resurgence of interest in regional therapies like cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Small trials have indicated an association with prolonged survival when applying this technique to AGC manifesting with PC. High procedure-related morbidity and mortality associated with the CRS-HIPEC approach have however brought by a polemic on the merits of the latter: with the advent of regulatory approval of more effective as well as novel, more personalized treatment options in AGC, along with advances in tailoring investigational agents specifically for peritoneal delivery, there clearly is a need to outline the appropriate role of CRS-HIPEC in this disease. In a clear objective to improve the therapeutic efficiency of HIPEC, there have been immense developments in the technical aspects of this technology including the use of nanotechnology in more precise drug delivery systems (DDS) or choice of more efficient drugs such as gene-target technology, laparoscopy and so on. Henceforth, in this review, we will be highlighting the past and current status of the CRS + HIPEC procedure, shedding light on the pros and cons in order to boost up the efficiency of this multimodality approach.

Preoperative Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer: Personal Interventions and Precision Medicine.

In spite of the declining incidence of gastric cancer (GC) in recent years, the mortality rate is still high. The asymptomatic nature and nonspecific clinical manifestations combined with the lack of efficient screening programs delay the diagnosis of GC. Therefore, the prevalence of advanced gastric cancer (AGC) has prompted the need for aggressive and intensive treatment options. Among the various treatment options for AGC, surgery is still the mainstay. However, the efficacy of surgery alone is not established. Results from multiple randomized controlled trials suggest that preoperative chemotherapy is promising intervention for the treatment and management of AGC. The main objective of neoadjuvant chemotherapy is to downstage or control micrometastasis in resectable tumor before surgery. On the other hand, conversion chemotherapy refers to surgical treatment aiming at R0 resection after chemotherapy for originally nonresectable or marginally resectable tumors. Nevertheless, preoperative chemoradiotherapy is considered beneficial for AGC patients. Over the last few decades, the combination of chemotherapy and targeted therapy prior to surgery demonstrated great results for the treatment of AGC. The rapid developments in genomics and proteomics have heralded the era of precision medicine. The combination of preoperative chemotherapy and precision medicine may enhance survival in AGC patients.